Under New York law, property acquired during a marriage is considered marital property, which means that it belongs to both parties. Thus, if a couple divorces, the court will equitably distribute any marital property. In many cases, however, the parties will not only dispute what constitutes a fair division of any marital property but also whether an asset is, in fact, marital property or the separate property of one spouse. In a recent case decided by the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York, the court explained the process of determining the value of contributions to separate property during divorce. If you and your spouse intend to divorce, it is essential to retain an experienced New York divorce attorney to help you understand how any property may be divided and what steps you can take to protect your interests.
Facts of the Case
The husband and the wife married in 1999 and had four children. In 2013, the wife filed an action for divorce, and the court entered an interim order for child support and maintenance. A trial was subsequently held, after which the court issued a judgment that, in part, awarded the wife a distribution from the appreciation of the marital home, and ordered the husband to pay the wife child support and maintenance until their youngest child reached the age of eighteen. The court also found that the wife owed the husband child support, since he had sole custody of the couple’s oldest child, but stated the payment was in abeyance until the husband paid the wife maintenance that was in arrears. The court also directed the husband to pay the wife’s counsel fees. The husband appealed on several issues.
Marital Versus Separate Property
The first issue the appellate court addressed on appeal was whether the trial court erred in awarding the wife $25,000 for the appreciation of the marital home. The court stated that it is clear under New York law, equitable distribution does not mean equal, and that a trial court has substantial leeway in determining what constitutes a fair division of assets. In the subject case, the court noted that the husband purchased the marital home prior to the marriage, and it was therefore separate property that was not subject to equitable distribution.
The court stated that a home that constitutes separate property cannot be transformed into marital property by the contributions of efforts of the spouse that does not own the property. The court explained, however, that contributions to separate property by a non-owner spouse could cause the property to appreciate, and that the value of the appreciation of the property was subject to distribution. Thus, as the trial court found that the wife worked to improve the marital home during the course of the marriage, which included doubling its size, the wife was entitled to an award of a portion of the value of the home’s appreciation.
Speak with an experienced New York City Divorce Attorney
Often one of the most contested issues in a divorce case is how property should be divided. If you or your spouse contemplate a divorce, it is crucial to retain a knowledgeable New York divorce attorney who will fight to help you seek a just and equitable distribution of any marital property. Ksenia Rudyuk at Rudyuk Law Firm, P.C. is a trusted New York family law attorney who will zealously pursue the best outcome available under the facts of your case. You can reach Ms. Rudyuk through her form online or at 212-706-2001 to schedule a meeting.