Published on: | by

Few legal battles are as emotionally charged as international child custody disputes. When one parent relocates a child to another country without the other parent’s consent, it raises serious legal and ethical concerns. The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction exists to prevent wrongful removals and ensure that custody disputes are resolved in the child’s home country. A case recently decided by a New York court highlights the importance of legal custody agreements and the challenges parents face when one party disregards a court order. If you are involved in a child custody dispute that extends beyond national borders, it is in your best interest to meet with an experienced New York family law attorney to discuss your rights.

Factual and Procedural Background

It is reported that the father filed a petition under the Hague Convention, seeking the return of his son to Turkey after the mother relocated with the child to the United States without his approval. The parents, who divorced in Turkey, had a custody agreement incorporated into their divorce decree, which granted the mother sole custody. However, allegedly, the agreement also contained specific provisions requiring the father’s approval for major decisions, including the child’s relocation, schooling, and healthcare.

Allegedly despite these provisions, the mother moved the child to the United States without obtaining the father’s consent. The father argued that this move violated his custodial rights under Turkish law, amounting to wrongful retention under the Hague Convention. The mother, in response, contended that her sole custody status in Turkey granted her the unilateral right to decide where the child lived. Continue reading

Published on: | by

Ending a marriage can greatly impact people not only emotionally but also financially. As such, it is not surprising that people often want to resolve the financial disputes that arise in divorce proceedings as expeditiously as possible. Generally, however, the courts will not bifurcate spousal support and divorce claims to move along proceedings, as discussed in a recent New York ruling. If you are involved in a divorce and have questions about how you can protect your financial health, it is smart to consult a skilled New York divorce attorney.

History of the Case

It is reported that the wife initiated divorce proceedings and, as part of the litigation, the husband sought pendente lite spousal support. The husband allegedly argued that the issue of spousal support should be transferred to Family Court, believing that it would lead to a quicker resolution. Additionally, the husband sought a greater temporary maintenance award than what was initially determined by the trial court.

Allegedly, the trial court denied the husband’s request to bifurcate the proceedings, reasoning that bifurcation is generally disfavored in matrimonial cases. The trial court reportedly expressed concerns that separate proceedings in Family Court and Supreme Court could lead to inconsistent rulings and procedural delays. The husband was also ordered to discontinue his pending Family Court action. Continue reading

Published on: | by

Prenuptial agreements are designed to provide clarity and safeguard individual assets in the event of a marriage dissolution. However, disputes often arise regarding their validity, as demonstrated in a recent New York case in which the court determined that a trial was needed to determine whether a prenuptial agreement should be upheld. If you have questions about how a prenuptial agreement may impact your rights if you decide to end your marriage, it is crucial to consult a New York divorce attorney who can advise you of your options.

Factual and Procedural History

It is reported that the wife and husband entered into a prenuptial agreement a week prior to their wedding. The wife allegedly insisted on the agreement at her family’s request, assuring the husband that its purpose was solely to protect premarital assets, including her interest in her mother’s business. The wife’s attorney drafted the agreement, and the husband, reportedly lacking independent counsel, signed it after reviewing it briefly in the wife’s attorney’s office.

Allegedly, the marriage lasted a few years, during which the husband contended he largely gave up his photography career to care for the couple’s young child while the wife pursued her career as a pharmacist. The terms of the agreement deprived the husband of equitable distribution of marital assets, including properties purchased during the marriage, but titled solely in the wife’s name. The husband asserted that he was misled into believing the agreement was fair and later realized it contained provisions waiving his rights to marital assets and maintenance. Continue reading

Published on: | by

In New York, child support determinations typically require courts to evaluate each parent’s financial circumstances and apply statutory guidelines. Notably, in doing so, the courts will generally regard documentary evidence regarding income over uncorroborated testimony, as demonstrated in a recent New York ruling issued in a child support case. If you are involved in a child support dispute, it is smart to talk to an attorney about what evidence you should offer to support your position.

History of the Case

It is reported that the mother filed a petition seeking initial child support against the father, who is the non-custodial parent of their child born in 2019. Allegedly, the father, who also has other children from a prior relationship, was subject to an earlier consent order requiring him to pay child and spousal support to his former wife. Following a fact-finding hearing in 2022, at which only the mother testified, the support magistrate ordered the father to pay $2,400 per month in basic child support. Additionally, the father was required to contribute $1,179.24 monthly for childcare expenses and health insurance premiums.

Allegedly, the support magistrate calculated the father’s annual income at $200,075 based on his individual tax returns, W-2 statements, and corporate tax filings. The calculation included business income from the father’s private law practice and undistributed earnings. The court imputed no additional income to the mother, who was raising the child as a single parent while working part-time as an attorney. Dissatisfied with the ruling, the father appealed, challenging the income imputation and the overall child support award. Continue reading

Published on: | by

It is not unusual for parents to enter into custody agreements during divorce proceedings. These agreements are often incorporated into court orders, making them legally enforceable. However, when disputes arise, or significant changes occur, courts are called upon to interpret and enforce these agreements. A recent New York case highlights the challenges of enforcing complex parenting time arrangements and modifying custody agreements. If you are dealing with issues surrounding custody enforcement or modification, it is important to understand your options, and you should speak with an experienced New York child custody attorney.

Background of the Case

It is alleged that the parties resolved their divorce through a Stipulation of Settlement dated June 21, 2023, which incorporated a Final Order of Custody on Consent. This agreement included a highly detailed joint custody schedule that was designed to evolve over time. Initially, the father was granted more parenting time, with the stipulation that nine months later, the arrangement would transition to a 50-50 custody schedule, pending input from the child’s therapist and the child’s preferences.

It is reported that disputes arose when the transition date approached. The mother sought enforcement of the agreement’s 50-50 parenting time provision, arguing that the schedule was clear and non-negotiable. She also alleged that the father impeded the process by failing to facilitate the child’s access to a therapist. The mother further moved for contempt against the father for violating the agreement and requested financial relief related to debts and child support add-ons. Continue reading

Published on: | by

New York courts prioritize the best interests of the child in custody cases, ensuring that any custody arrangement will provide the child with a safe and stable environment. As demonstrated in a recent New York decision, doing so may sometimes require the courts to grant one parent sole custody over the other parent’s objections. If you need assistance with a custody dispute, it is in your best interest to consult with a knowledgeable New York family law attorney. 

Factual and Procedural Setting

It is alleged that the mother and father married and had a child together.

Continue reading

Published on: | by

New York courts prioritize the best interests of the child in custody and support cases, ensuring that both parents meet their obligations. A recent New York decision reaffirmed the court’s discretion in determining custody and child support, emphasizing that such rulings will not be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence. If you need assistance with a custody or support dispute, it is in your best interest to consult with a knowledgeable New York family law attorney.

History of the Case

It is alleged that the plaintiff and defendant were married in 2002 and have four children. The plaintiff initiated divorce proceedings in 2017, seeking custody and ancillary relief. The trial court granted sole legal and physical custody of the two youngest children to the plaintiff, finding that the best interests of the children warranted such an arrangement. Additionally, the court ordered the defendant to pay $4,124 per month in child support and awarded $40,000 in attorney’s fees to the plaintiff.

Reportedly, the defendant appealed, arguing that the custody and support determinations were inequitable. He contested the imputation of income used to calculate his child support obligations and challenged the attorney’s fees award, asserting that it was not supported by the record. Continue reading

Published on: | by

In New York, divorce judgments often include stipulations designed to secure financial support for children and dependent spouses. As reaffirmed in a recent New York decision issued in a divorce action, family courts may enforce these stipulations, including life insurance provisions, to ensure continued support. If you seek to enforce a provision in your divorce decree, it is wise to consult with a New York family law attorney to understand your options.

History of the Case

It is reported that the plaintiff and defendant were divorced by judgment in August 2019, which incorporated but did not merge their 2018 settlement agreement. Allegedly, the settlement required the plaintiff to maintain a $1 million life insurance policy for the benefit of the children and dependent spouse, as set out in the stipulation. In 2020, the plaintiff reportedly filed a motion to hold the defendant in contempt for allegedly violating certain terms of the divorce judgment. The defendant, in turn, cross-moved to enforce the life insurance provision stipulated in the judgment, citing the plaintiff’s non-compliance.

Allegedly, following a hearing, the trial court granted the defendant’s cross-motion, ordering the plaintiff to comply with the life insurance requirement as outlined in the divorce judgment. The plaintiff appealed, arguing that he was not in contempt and challenging the enforcement of the life insurance provision. Continue reading

Published on: | by

Generally, the New York family law courts strive to maintain and protect the relationships between parents and their children. They will only do so if it is in the child’s best interest, however. As such, if a court finds that one parent fails to abide by court measures intended to protect a child, they may grant the other parent sole custody, as demonstrated in a recent New York case. If you or your co-parent wish to seek sole custody of your child, it is advisable to confer with a New York child custody attorney at your earliest convenience.

Factual and Procedural Setting 

It is reported that both the father and the mother filed petitions to modify the custody arrangement of their two children, born in 2016 and 2018, as established by a 2021 divorce judgment. Initially, the mother was granted primary physical custody, while the father had alternate weekend parenting time. In May 2021, the father sought custody modification, alleging that the mother restricted his visitation and engaged in actions that alienated him from the children. The mother cross-petitioned, stating that she restricted the father’s visitation because he violated COVID-19 guidelines and failed to attend a court-mandated parenting program.

Allegedly, further petitions were filed, with the mother asserting that the father violated the terms of the divorce judgment by failing to inform her of the children’s whereabouts, neglecting their health and safety, and disregarding parenting conditions. Eventually, the case was transferred to the Integrated Domestic Violence part of the trial court, where the mother sought sole custody, alleging domestic abuse by the father. The trial court granted the mother’s petition, and the father appealed. Continue reading

Published on: | by

Many married people with children ultimately decide to end their union. As such, in addition to relying on the courts to determine their rights and obligations with regard to assets and liabilities, they will look to the courts to decide how custody should be divided. While New York law is clear that custody determinations must be in a child’s best interests, in some cases, the court’s decisions do not reflect that and can be challenged. In a recent ruling in which the court amended the trial court’s order, a New York court discussed the grounds for overturning custody determinations. If you intend to seek a divorce and want to know how it may impact your parental rights, it is smart to speak to a New York child custody attorney promptly.

Factual and Procedural Background

It is reported that the parties were married in April 2013 and had two children together. In July 2018, they began living separately, and in February 2022, the husband initiated an action for divorce and ancillary relief. The wife responded with an answer, asserting various counterclaims, including one for child support. The court held a nonjury trial to address issues concerning custody, parental access, child support, and equitable distribution of marital property.

Continue reading
Contact Information
20 Vesey St #400
New York, NY 10007
Phone: (212) 706-2001
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2019 – 2025, Rudyuk Law Firm
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design